27 Mar 2010 @ 8:00 PM 

Stephen Gutwillig California State Director, Drug Policy Alliance Posted: March 24, 2010 11:53 AM BIO Become a Fan Get Email Alerts Bloggers’ Index CA Marijuana Legalization Initiative to Qualify for Ballot Today What’s Your Reaction: digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost – stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS Amazing Inspiring Funny Scary Hot Crazy Important Weird Read More: African Americans , California-Initiatives , California-To-Legalize-Marijuana , Drug Laws , Drug Legalization , Felipe Calderon , Hillary Clinton , Legalize Marijuana , Legalize Pot , Marijuana , Marijuana Tax , Medical Marijuana , Mexico , Mexico Drug Wars , Prison , Racism , Los Angeles News 1,870 915views 1,513 Get Breaking News Alerts * Share * Comments 1,513 Today, an initiative that would legalize personal marijuana possession and allow regulated sales of marijuana to adults will qualify for California’s November general election ballot. A win at the ballot would be a first of its kind in U.S. history. This is a remarkable moment in the struggle to change our decades-old marijuana policies. Marijuana was prohibited in 1937 before most Americans had ever heard of it. Today the U.S. leads the world in marijuana consumption. Nearly 26 million Americans used marijuana last year and more than 100 million have tried it in their lifetimes. A huge commodity of the underground economy, marijuana is the nation’s top cash crop, valued at $14 billion in California alone. Our state Board of Equalization has estimated we would generate $1.4 billion a year by taxing marijuana like alcohol. Like it or not, marijuana has become a mainstream recreational drug. It is second only to alcohol and cigarettes in popularity and is objectively far less harmful than either. Marijuana is drastically less addictive and cannot cause an overdose. Every major independent study has debunked the gateway myth; for the profound majority of users, marijuana is the only drug people sample not the first. Children across the country consistently report that marijuana is easy for them to get from their peers and the black market while significant barriers exist to buying alcohol and cigarettes. Unthinkable carnage in Mexico has claimed 15,000 lives since the Calderon government declared war on drug cartels three years ago. Our government estimates the cartels generate at least 60% of their profits from marijuana alone. Following the murders of several U.S. consular workers, Secretary of State Clinton returned to Mexico this week, acknowledging that demand in the U.S. dominates these markets. But she didn’t acknowledge that rampant violence is not a byproduct of the cannabis plant itself but of the prohibition that creates a profit motive people are willing to kill for. Americans are increasingly turning against the prohibition that fails to protect our kids and guarantees a monopoly of profits to violent criminal syndicates on both sides of the border. While polls have long confirmed that large majorities favor treating marijuana possession as an infraction without arrest let alone jail, support for ending marijuana prohibition outright is quickly gaining speed. A Gallup poll last year reported that a historic 44 percent of Americans favor legalization, a 10-point jump since 2001. Meanwhile, sizable majorities of Californians are ahead of that curve, giving rise to the historic initiative we’ll vote on this fall. With this cultural transition underway, you might think enforcement of our marijuana laws would reflect their unpopularity. Sadly, quite the opposite is the case. Arrests for marijuana offenses have actually tripled nationwide since 1991. In California, which decriminalized low-level possession in 1975, arrests have jumped 127 percent in the same two decades the arrest rate for crime in general fell by 40 percent. Police made nearly 850,000 marijuana arrests across the country last year, half of all drug arrests and more than all violent crime arrests combined. No law in the United States is enforced so widely yet deemed so unnecessary. Worse still, marijuana laws are enforced selectively with racist results. In California, African Americans are three times more likely than whites to be arrested for a marijuana offense despite comparable or even lower rates of consumption. An expose by the Pasadena Weekly found that blacks, who represent 14 percent of that city’s population, accounted for more than half all marijuana arrests in the last five years. It’s hard to overstate the significance of the vote this November. Banning marijuana outright has been a disaster, fueling a massive, increasingly brutal, underground economy, wasting billions in scarce law enforcement resources, and making criminals of countless law-abiding citizens. Elected officials haven’t stopped these punitive, profligate policies. Now voters can bring the reality check of sensible marijuana regulation to California. Stephen Gutwillig is the California State Director of the Drug Policy Alliance, the nation’s leading organization working to promote alternatives to the failed war on drugs.

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:00 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 7:58 PM 

Arizona Senate OKs medical marijuana tax

Posted: Mar 26, 2010 5:32 PM EDT Updated: Mar 26, 2010 9:28 PM EDT

PHOENIX (AP) – Arizona voters could get the chance to legalize medical marijuana, and the state Legislature may tax it.

A group called the Medical Marijuana Policy Project is gathering signatures for a voter initiative that would make it legal to have small amount of pot with a doctor’s recommendation.

If the measure gets on the November ballot and is approved by voters, a bill by Tucson Democratic Sen. Jorge Garcia calls for taxing the marijuana sold under the act.

The Senate’s 17-12 vote Thursday sends the bill to the House.

An analysis by the nonpartisan legislative budget staff found that taxing medical marijuana could generate nearly $1 million for the state General Fund in the 2012 fiscal year.

(Copyright 2010 by The Associated Press.  All Rights Reserved.)

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 07:58 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 7:57 PM 

Legal-marijuana advocates focus on a new green

Jim Wilson/The New York Times
Supporters of a ballot measure that would tax and regulate marijuana in California say it could raise $1.4 billion a year.

By JESSE McKINLEY
New York Times

Published: Friday, March 26, 2010 at 5:07 p.m.
Last Modified: Friday, March 26, 2010 at 5:07 p.m.

( page all of 4 )

SAN FRANCISCO — Perhaps only in California could a group of marijuana smokers call themselves fiscal realists.


And yet, faced with a $20 billion deficit, strained state services and regular legislative paralysis, voters in California are now set to consider a single-word solution to help ease some of the state’s money troubles: legalize.

On Wednesday, the California secretary of state certified a November vote on a ballot measure that would legalize, tax and regulate marijuana, a plan that advocates say could raise $1.4 billion and save precious law enforcement and prison resources.

Indeed, unlike previous efforts at legalization — including a failed 1972 measure in California — the 2010 campaign will not dwell on assertions of marijuana’s harmlessness or its social acceptance, but rather on cold cash.

“We need the tax money,” said Richard Lee, founder of Oaksterdam University, a trade school for marijuana growers, in Oakland, who backed the ballot measure’s successful petition drive. “Second, we need the tax savings on police and law enforcement, and have that law enforcement directed towards real crime.”

Supporters are hoping to raise $10 million to $20 million for the campaign, primarily on the Internet, with national groups planning to urge marijuana fans to contribute $4.20 at a time, a nod to 420, a popular shorthand for the drug.

The law would permit licensed retailers to sell up to one ounce at a time. Those sales would be a new source of sales tax revenue for the state.

Opponents, however, scoff at the notion that legalizing marijuana could somehow help with the state’s woes. They tick off a list of social ills — including tardiness and absenteeism in the workplace — that such an act would contribute to.

“We just don’t think any good is going to come from this,” said John Standish, president of the California Peace Officers Association, whose 3,800 members include police chiefs and sheriffs. “It’s not going to better society. It’s going to denigrate it.”

The question of legalization, which a 2009 Field Poll showed 56 percent of Californians supporting, will undoubtedly color the state race for governor. The two major Republican candidates — the former eBay chief executive Meg Whitman and the insurance commissioner, Steve Poizner — have said they oppose the bill.

Jerry Brown, the Democratic attorney general who is also running for governor, opposes the idea as well, saying it violates federal law.

And while the Obama administration has signaled that it will tolerate medical marijuana users who abide the law in the 14 states where it is legal, a law authorizing personal use would conflict with federal law.

Supporters of the bill say the proposal’s language would allow cities or local governments to opt out, likely creating “dry counties” in some parts of the state. The proposed law would allow only those over 21 to buy, and would ban smoking marijuana in public or around minors.

Stephen Gutwillig, the California state director for the Drug Policy Alliance, a New York-based group that plans to raise money in favor of the measure, said he expected “a conservative implementation,” if passed.

“I think most local jurisdictions are not going to authorize sales,” Mr. Gutwillig said.

Local opt-out provisions are part of a strategy to allay people’s fears about adding another legal vice and to help capture a group considered key to passing the bill: non-pot-smoking swing voters.

“There’s going to be a large sector of the electorate that would never do this themselves that’s going to sort out what the harm would be versus what the supposed good would be,” said Frank Schubert, a longtime California political strategist who opposes the bill. “That’s where the election is going to be won.”

But Dan Newman, a San Francisco-based strategist for the ballot measure, said he expected broad, bipartisan support for the bill, especially among those Californians worried about the recession.

“Voters’ No. 1 concern right now is the budget and the economy,” Mr. Newman said, “which makes them look particularly favorable at something that will bring in more than $1 billion a year.” Opponents, however, question that figure — which is based on a 2009 report from the Board of Equalization, which oversees taxes in the state — and argue that whatever income is brought in will be spent dealing with more marijuana-related crimes.

Mr. Standish said: “We have a hard enough time now with drunk drivers on the road. This is just going to add to the problems.”

He added: “I cannot think of one crime scene I’ve been to where people said, ‘Thank God the person was just under the influence of marijuana.’ ”

Advocates of the measure plan to counter what is expected to be a strong law enforcement opposition with advertisements like one scheduled to be broadcast on radio in San Francisco and Los Angeles starting on Monday. The advertisements will feature a former deputy sheriff saying the war on marijuana has failed.

“It’s time to control it,” he concludes, “and tax it.”

Not everyone in the community is supportive. Don Duncan, a co-founder of Americans for Safe Access, which lobbies for medical marijuana, said he had reservations about the prospect of casual users joining the ranks of those with prescriptions.

“The taxation and regulation of cannabis at the local or state level may or may not improve conditions for medical cannabis patients,” Mr. Duncan said in an e-mail message. He added that issues like “police harassment and the price and quality of medicine might arise if legalization for recreational users occurs.”

Still, the idea of legal marijuana does not seem too far-fetched to people like Shelley Kutilek, a San Francisco resident, loyal church employee and registered California voter, who said she would vote “yes” in November.

“It’s no worse than alcohol,” said Ms. Kutilek, 30, an administrator at Metropolitan Community Church of San Francisco. “Drunk people get really belligerent. I don’t know anybody who gets belligerent on marijuana. They just get chill.”

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 07:57 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 7:56 PM 

UM prohibits medical marijuana on campus for fear of losing federal funds

By CHELSI MOY of the Missoulian | Posted: Friday, March 26, 2010 6:30 am

By John Hudson on March 26, 2010 12:48pm

This November, California voters will decide whether their state becomes the first to legalize marijuana for recreational use. In 1996, California was the first to legalize medical marijuana and since then 14 other states have jumped on board. There are many reasons to oppose legalization at the state level. Here are the reasons for it:

  • So Many Benefits to Society, writes Nick Gillespie in a New York Times op-ed. “As the history of alcohol prohibition underscores, there are also many non-economic reasons to favor legalization of vices: Prohibition rarely achieves its desired goals and instead increases violence (when was the last time a tobacco kingpin was killed in a deal gone wrong?) and destructive behavior (it’s hard enough to get help if you’re a substance abuser and that much harder if you’re a criminal too). And by policing vice, law enforcement is too often distracted at best or corrupted at worst, as familiar headlines about cops pocketing bribes and seized drugs attest.” Also, pot will get cheaper.
  • States Need the Money, writes Lew Rockwell. He thinks all trends point to legalization: “Once the grim reality of tax revenues sinks in, the states will get a lot more desperate than they already are. The property tax revenues still reflect pre-crash valuations. New post-crash property values will start to slash property tax revenues in a couple of years, and then we’ll see a lot more enthusiasm for the Pot Tax.”
  • It’s Good for Both Left and Right, writes About.com’s Economics Blog: “Liberals would get legalized marijuana, conservatives would see less pressure on having taxes rise.”
  • It’s a Huge Crime Reducer, writes Joe Messerli at Balanced Politics: “Perhaps the biggest opponents of legalizing drugs are the drug dealers themselves. They make their enormous sums of money because of the absence of competition and the monstrous street prices that come from the increased risk. Legalization would lower prices and open competition; thus, drug cartels (that might include terrorists) would lose all or some of their business.”
  • Mega Corporations Won’t Enter the Market, writes Kevin Drum at Mother Jones. He addresses the threat of having Philip Morris enter the pot business and employ mass advertising campagins: “So what would stop the multinational marketing juggernauts from doing exactly that? For starters, the federal government, which still classifies marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug—as it’s required to do by international treaty. That means it’s flatly prohibited, and even if the feds decided not to bother prosecuting small-time growers they’d almost certainly go after a Fortune 500 corporation that got into the business. Along with the PR damage of being part of the pot industry, this would almost certainly be enough to keep the Philip Morrises of the world at bay.”
Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 07:53 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 7:52 PM 

Flood of medical-marijuana applications forces change

The Denver Post

Posted: 03/26/2010 01:00:00 AM MDT

Updated: 03/26/2010 02:15:46 PM MDT

Inundated with medical-marijuana patient applications, Colorado’s health department has changed one way it handles the flood of paperwork.

Starting April 1, health department workers will no longer review applications submitted at the department’s walk-up window to make sure they are complete before accepting them. In a news release, the health department said that practice unfairly gave walk-up applications priority and contributed to a backlog of mailed-in applications.

The department has been receiving about 1,000 applications per workday, nearly quadruple the number it was receiving per day over the summer, according to the release.

The lag between when an application is received and when a license is issued has now stretched to six months. The department is awaiting legislative approval of funding to add temporary workers to help with the backlog.

John Ingold, The Denver Post

Read more: http://www.denverpost.com/technology/ci_14760247#ixzz0jQMV67G8

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 07:52 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 7:50 PM 

Californians to vote on legal weed

medical_marijuana_rally.gi.top.jpgOAKLAND, Calif.: A medical marijuana activist holds a sign during a rally on Jan. 4, 2010.

By Aaron Smith, CNNMoney.com staff writerMarch 25, 2010: 3:21 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) — It’s official: Californians will decide whether legal marijuana should be used to plug the state’s $20 billion budget gap.

California residents are expected to vote this year on whether legalization should be approved to raise nearly $1.4 billion in state revenue. That’s based on an estimate from the State Board of Equalization, a tax administration agency.

“It would be another source of revenue for the state,” said Anita Gore, spokeswoman for the board. The board has not issued an opinion on legalization as a means of easing the state’s budget crisis, she added.

California Secretary Debra Brown confirmed on Wednesday that enough signatures had been collected to put AB 390, a marijuana legalization bill, on the ballot for Nov. 2. A press release from the secretary said that legalization proponents submitted 694,248 petition signatures for the bill, easily surpassing the required 433,791.

“The momentum for reform has grown exponentially since we introduced the bill last year,” said Quitin Mecke, spokesman for Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, the lead sponsor of the bill. “We’re excited about the prospect to reform drug laws again.”

Mecke noted that California was the first state to pass legislation allowing medicinal marijuana, 14 years ago.

0:00 /2:42Marijuana on the ballot

Unlike prior legislation that has passed in California and other states, this form of legalization is not restricted to medicinal use of marijuana. The bill proposes that marijuana be regulated and taxed in a similar way to alcohol.

According to the bill, people would have to be 21 years or older “to possess, cultivate, or transport marijuana for personal use.” Californians would not be permitted to use the drug in public or within the presence of minors, and would not be allowed to possess it on school grounds.

Most importantly, as far as the budget gap is concerned, the bill stipulates that the drug would be subject to a sales tax. An additional retail fee of $50 would be imposed on every ounce that’s sold.

The State Board of Equalization estimates that the state could raise $1.382 billion in annual tax revenues from legal marijuana. The figure is based on estimated revenue of $990 million from the retail fees and $392 million from sales taxes.

“With the state in the midst of an historic economic crisis, the move towards regulating and taxing marijuana is simply common sense,” Ammiano said in a press release when he first proposed the bill last year.

Also, Mecke said that legalization could prompt the state to “reallocate” more than $300 million in law enforcement spending away from non-violent drug activity to address violent crimes.  To top of page

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 07:50 PM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:39 AM 

Washington’s medical marijuana law needs fine-tuning

The recent attacks on two homes of medical-marijuana patients who are also providers has highlighted some flaws in Washington’s current law. State Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles, D-Seattle, proposes some changes that will still permit patients to get the medical marijuana they need.

By Jeanne Kohl-Welles

Special to The Times

IN the past two weeks, we have seen two traumatic incidents involving medical marijuana.

On March 9 and again on March 15, the homes of two medical-marijuana patients who are also providers were the sites of violent home invasions. The victim of the first attack died from his wounds. The owner of the second home suffered injuries in a gunfight that also left one of his attackers critically wounded. These attacks highlight shortcomings in our law and the need for reform.

In 1998, the people approved Initiative 692 by a margin of 59 percent, which allowed doctors to authorize the use of medical marijuana for patients with terminal or debilitating conditions. While the law also allows patients to grow their own plants or designate a provider to grow them, it does not provide guidance on where to obtain seeds or cuttings. The law also states that a designated provider may serve “only one patient at any one time.” The vagueness of the current law makes it very difficult for patients to get the medication they need and are legally entitled to.

Some are working to make medical marijuana more readily accessible to patients. Last June, the Change Dispensary opened its doors in Spokane and made no secret of the fact that it was providing medical marijuana to multiple patients. Its owners were arrested and charged with felonies.

Our law puts patients and providers in an impossible position. A patient or provider can comply with the law and still be subject to arrest, prosecution or seizure of medical marijuana. Often, a patient or provider must endure the stress, cost and embarrassment of a trial — and the patient must disclose private medical information — before being acquitted by a jury.

This failure to provide complete protection leaves everyone — patients, doctors, providers and law enforcement — confused about the rules. Because of this, patients and providers are often afraid to call on law enforcement for protection from burglars or even to report thefts or assaults.

It is time to provide qualified medical-marijuana patients complete protection under the law and to directly regulate the production and dispensing of cannabis. Patients should not have to fear arrest, home searches or property seizures by law-enforcement officers. Providers who want to help patients access medical marijuana should not have to risk prosecution and robbery.

As King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg recently told The New York Times, “By forcing this production to remain underground, you increase the risk of violence for everybody and you disburse that violence to residential neighborhoods and put everybody at risk.”

More than a decade has passed since Washington’s citizens clearly stated that physician-authorized medical use of marijuana should be legal. In 2011, I will introduce legislation to protect patients from arrest and prosecution and provide well-regulated, safe, consistent and secure sources of cannabis for medical use through licensed dispensaries. I hope citizens across the state will help me pass this legislation to improve the safety of patients, our loved ones and the communities in which we live.

Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles, D-Seattle, chairs the Senate Labor, Commerce & Consumer Protection Committee. She was prime sponsor of Senate Bill 5798, passed by the Legislature on March 11, which extends to all health-care professionals with prescriptive authority the ability to authorize the medical use of marijuana.

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:39 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:38 AM 

San Diego Council Committee Votes To Legalize Marijuana Dispensaries

By Tom Fudge

March 24, 2010

SAN DIEGO — Medical marijuana dispensaries could be operating legally in San Diego within a few months, now that a San Diego City Council committee has passed a draft ordinance to regulate them.

The San Diego land use and housing committee approved a plan that would place many restrictions on marijuana dispensaries. They cannot be located within a thousand feet of a school, a park or another marijuana dispensary. They would also be kept out of commercial zones near residential areas.

Even so, Alex Kreit, the chair of the city’s medical marijuana task force, called the council vote a major step forward.

“And hopefully we’ll be getting an ordinance in place sometimes in the next few months because of moving the ball forward here today,” he said. “So I think it’s fantastic.”

Councilman Tony Young opposed the ordinance because it contains no cap on the number of marijuana dispensaries allowed within city limits. The full City Council must approve the plan before it becomes law.

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:38 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:37 AM 

Los Angeles Pot Dispensary Crackdown Expected In May

By Steve Elliott in Dispensaries, Legislation
Wednesday, Mar. 24 2010 @ 1:46PM
marijuana-leaf.jpeg
Graphic: L.A. Weekly

It’s the beginning of the end for hundreds of Los Angeles medical marijuana dispensaries.

Most of the pot shops are about to be wiped out by L.A.’s new dispensary ordinance, which severely limits where they can be located, reports Dennis Romero at L.A. Weekly.
Councilman Ed Reyes is predicting that “noncompliant” shops — which means all of them, other than the 187 that were in business before the city imposed a moratorium — will start being shut down in May.
About 545 dispensaries are operating in Los Angeles, according to a comprehensive county by the L.A. Weekly (PDF). The City Council voted to winnow those down to 187 by declaring all the shops that opened after the moratorium — exploiting a boilerplate “hardship” exemption included in its language — noncompliant.
The number will eventually, through attrition, be reduced to 70 shops. Until that time, when any of the 187 permitted dispensaries go out of business, they won’t be replaced.

Under the ordinance, each permitted dispensary will be required to pay nearly $1,600 in fees. The funds will be used for background checks for dispensary managers.
While two City Council committees — Planning and Land Use Management, and Finance — have approved $1,595 in registration fees for each shop, the entire council, which has been studying the dispensary issue for more than two years, still hasn’t approved the fees.
Medical marijuana advocacy group Americans for Safe Access (ASA) has challenged the dispensary ordinance in court. ASA says it might also seek a temporary restraining order to prevent any shops being closed down under the ordinance.
Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:37 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:35 AM 

County Given Federal Clearance To Take Patients To Pot Dispensary

By Steve Elliott in Dispensaries, Medical
Thursday, Mar. 25 2010 @ 1:24PM
bilde.jpeg
Photo: V. Richard Haro/The Coloradoan
Donnie Hayes of Fort Collins, Colorado, is a blind medical marijuana patient who was initially denied a ride to the dispensary in a county vehicle for disabled people.

Larimer County, Colorado officials have given the go-ahead for a disabled medical marijuana patient to resume catching a ride to get his medicine at a dispensary in a county-owned vehicle.

The Larimer Lift, a paratransit service for disabled people living outside city limits, will now take clients to medical marijuana dispensaries “and anywhere else they wish to go,” according to Gary Darling, director of criminal justice services for the county, reports Kevin Dugan at the Fort Collins Coloradoan.
Larimer Lift officials had previously stopped taking Donnie Hayes, a blind medical marijuana patient, to a dispensary in Fort Collins, blaming their uncertainty over whether doing so could jeopardize federal funding for the program.

Hayes has a state-issued medical marijuana card, but possession of marijuana for any reason remains a federal crime.
After notifying the Federal Transit Authority (FTA) of the potential conflict between federal and state law, the program was given clearance to transport medical marijuana patients, according to Darling.
“We were told we need to follow what the contract says, which is to provide transportation services,” he said.
The FTA’s direction was that the Larimer Lift program should not “judge the destination” of a person who qualifies for a ride, according to Joe Ferrando, director of Community Corrections, which operates the paratransit service.
Hayes said he’s glad the matter is cleared up. He used Larimer Lift last week to visit a dispensary and buy marijuana.
“They’ll take me wherever I want to go, no questions asked,” he said. “I’m happy with that.”
Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:35 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:34 AM 

Marijuana Discussion Urged At Clinton’s Drug Policy Summit

By Steve Elliott in Global, Legislation
Tuesday, Mar. 23 2010 @ 1:08PM
Hillary-Busted--13004.jpeg
Graphic: Freaking News
The Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) on Tuesday urged U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to include a discussion of marijuana prohibition — and effective alternatives to it — at a major drug policy summit in Mexico.

Secretary of State Clinton is leading a delegation, including Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen, to Mexico City for a two-day conference focusing on ways the United States and Mexico can “break the power” of drug-trafficking organizations.

The talks come just a week after the execution-style killings of three people in Mexico, including two American citizens and their unborn baby, linked to a U.S. Consulate.
Since December 2006, there have been more than 18,000 killings in Mexico, with no end in sight. According to the Justice Department, Mexican cartels now operate in 230 American cities.
AaronHoustonRussiaToday12172008.jpg
Photo: MPP
Aaron Houston: “The only way to ‘break the power’ of these gangs is to regulate marijuana”
“Officials have already shown they are not serious about breaking the power of Mexican drug cartels, since they have refused to acknowledge the unrivaled role marijuana prohibition has played in lining the pockets of these murderous gangs, who are now — by all indications — targeting Americans for assassination,” said Aaron Houston, director of government relations for MPP.
“The only way to ‘break the power’ of these gangs is to regulate marijuana and remove it from the criminal market,” Houston said. “According to our own government, the cartels make 70 percent of their profits from marijuana sales in the U.S. It is unconscionable that officials continue to support a policy that funnels billions of dollars to groups who are now murdering Americans.”
During a visit to Mexico City in March 2009, Secretary Clinton said the United States has a “co-responsibility” to confront Mexico’s growing violence because “our insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade.”
Former leaders of Mexico, Brazil and Colombia have all called for an end to prohibition in order to stem the violence.
In December 2009, the Wall Street Journal reported that growing numbers of U.S. and Mexican officials say privately that regulating marijuana may be the only solution to the current crisis.
“No policy will ever extinguish the demand for marijuana,” Houston said. “Officials need to do the right thing by acknowledging prohibition’s role in this horrific carnage, and finally ending this failed policy.”
Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:34 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:32 AM 

Here is a very alarming e-mail that I just received. Figured it was worth passing along:

Dear Johnny,

Since June of 2008, ASA has been receiving calls from legally operating dispensing collectives stating that their business accounts have been closed by a variety of banking institutions.

These closures have occurred without explanation, and in many cases, without notice. One collective even received an un-signed form letter dated 6 days AFTER the account had already been closed!

Beginning in April of 2009, ASA has confirmed more attempts to shut down accounts by numerous financial institutions. This is particularly concerning for us because this activity comes after the US Department of Justice disseminated its new policy re: Investigations and Prosecutions in States Authorizing the Medical Use of Marijuana.

ASA is currently working with Members of Congress to investigate whether the US Department of Justice is involved. If you or someone you know has been a victim of this process, please share the details with ASA by replying to this message (action@safeaccessnow.org).

Thanks –

The ASA Team

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:32 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:30 AM 

99-plant medical pot limit given initial approval; final vote in April

By TIFFANY REVELLE The Daily Journal

Updated: 03/24/2010 12:00:14 AM PDT

A 99-plant maximum for permitted marijuana growers is the new limit after the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted 3-2 to adopt a set of changes to its ordinance governing medical marijuana cultivation, codified as Chapter 9.31 of the county code.

Fifth District Supervisor David Colfax and 3rd District Supervisor John Pinches voted against the changes.

“The people of California voted Prop. 215 (for) medical marijuana to be legal, but yet now we’re going to get the sheriff department involved and coming into the houses and their bedrooms and stuff … to me, that’s not the whole concept of what legal’ means,” Pinches said.

He also argued the county didn’t have the money to run violators through the court system, or to put them in jail.

“We’re taking money away from our other services we drastically need to basically prop up the price of marijuana,” Pinches said.

Colfax said the 9.31 revisions were “a horrible waste of time,” calling the new ordinance “a dream document for an authoritarian state.”

“I think this document before us is one of the most intrusive documents to come out of any administrative body I’ve ever seen,” Colfax said.

Second District Supervisor John McCowen, who sat with 4th District Supervisor Kendall Smith on the committee that drafted the changes, noted there were fewer than 30 attendees at the reading of the ordinance, fewer people than there were at the many meetings where the changes were hammered out.

“On those

previous occasions the room would be packed,” he said. “And the room was clearly divided into marijuana proponents and marijuana opponents, and we don’t have that today.”He noted the “mixed” responses the board had received in writing and during the public input portion of the Tuesday reading.

“I think what that proves is the fact that what was brought forward is a very balanced approach that makes a good-faith effort to address the needs of patients and also the concerns of people who have suffered the negative consequences of marijuana,” McCowen said.

Smith argued the new regulations “will help minimize the legal dollars, both in the citing of individuals for violations of the law, and in the prosecution of those individuals.”

Collectives and patients can grow up to 25 plants per parcel under the new ordinance, or apply for an exemption that would allow up to 99 plants, as long as the collective gets a permit from the Mendocino County Sheriff’s Office and follows a list of new regulations the ordinance imposes.

Reactions were mixed during the public discussion of the changes to 9.31 during the first reading of the newly revised ordinance. A second reading is expected in April. The revised law is effective 30 days after it passes, which usually happens at the second reading.

Long-time medical marijuana advocate and grower Pebbles Trippet and Mendocino County Sheriff Tom Allman both took issue with the changes, but for different reasons.

“I don’t see it helping because of the violence the large amounts of marijuana may attract,” Allman said of the new ordinance. “I predict we’ll see home invasions increase.”

He also said the new provisions for medical marijuana growing raise a number of questions, using as an example the requirement that anyone who applies for a permit to grow up to 99 plants “has not been convicted of a violent felony … and is not currently on parole or felony probation.”

Allman questioned whether that meant a background check would be needed, and if so, who would pay.

The ordinance requires growers applying for the 99-plant permit to buy Allman’s zip-ties for the plants, which cost $25 each.

Another provision of the ordinance calls for the Board of Supervisors to set a fee to cover the county’s cost for processing the application, including investigation.

Trippet maintained medical marijuana shouldn’t be regulated as a nuisance, as 9.31 does, and said the new ordinance was too restrictive for marijuana patients and growers.

She referred to a lawsuit five patients brought against the county in September claiming 9.31 was unconstitutional, saying after the board adopted the changes, “The courts, the people in the robes, will decide it.”

That court case may be back in court in May, if an Anaheim collective’s appeal filed with the Santa Ana appellate court is decided by then.

Trippet said the Anaheim case is pivotal to the 9.31 lawsuit.

“In Anaheim, they banned collectives; here they are reducing the rights of collectives, and they can’t do either one,” Trippet said.

County Counsel Jeanine Nadel said she’s taking a “wait and see” approach regarding how the Anaheim ruling will affect the county’s new regulations.

Matthew Cohen of Northstone Organics Cooperative, Inc. said he was “ecstatic” about the new regulations 9.31 imposes. Northstone grows marijuana for 250 patients in nine Bay Area counties, all of it tested by Steep Hill Labs of Oakland for quality.

“This is an incredibly progressive step forward for Mendocino County,” Cohen said. “Before long we’re going to have tested, certified organic, regulated product for medical cannabis patients.”

Steep Hill Labs tests for mold, bacteria and pesticide residues, and representatives said the organization applied to be a third-party investigator under the new 9.31 provisions.

“What we want to do is help local people comply with these regulations so they’re not a burden,” Dr. Janet Weiss of Steep Hill said.

Under the new ordinance, collectives or patients applying for the 99-plant permit can hire a third-party investigator instead of having the Sheriff’s Office investigate the grow site for compliance.

Tiffany Revelle can be reached at udjtr@pacific.net, or at 468-3523.


Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:30 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (10)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:28 AM 

Jury acquits dispenser of medical marijuana

By Greg Moran, UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

Originally published March 26, 2010 at 12:05 a.m., updated March 26, 2010 at 10:35 a.m.

SAN DIEGO COURTS — A jury acquitted a medical marijuana collective operator of drug possession and sales charges yesterday.

The acquittal of Eugene Davidovich after two weeks of trial in front of Superior Court Judge Kenneth So is the second time in the past four months that juries have found medical marijuana operators not guilty of drug charges.

In December, Jovan Jackson, who was the manager of a medical marijuana dispensary in Kearny Mesa, was acquitted of five counts of possessing and selling the drug. Davidovich’s case had become an important cause among medical marijuana proponents.

District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis has aggressively pursued medical marijuana dispensaries and collectives that she contends are not complying with Proposition 215, the voter-approved initiative that legalized the drug for medical purposes.

Davidovich, a former software developer, was charged with selling the drug to an undercover officer posing as a patient in November 2008 with a doctor’s prescription for the drug. The transaction was captured on videotape. Davidovich insisted he had done nothing wrong and believed that the man he sold the marijuana to was a legitimate patient and the purchase was part of the legal operations of the collective. In phone conversations before the transaction he had emphasized that the purchase was being done as part of the collective’s work and for no other reason, said Davidovich’s lawyer, Michael McCabe.

Jurors acquitted him of four charges relating to the transaction, which was part of a larger investigation of medical marijuana collectives dubbed Operation Green Rx, McCabe said.

“The jury saw this for what it was,” McCabe said. “They thought it was a trumped up case from the get-go.”

Deputy District Attorney Steve Walter said the outcome is “disappointing, but we respect the jury’s verdict.”

Greg Moran: (619) 293-1236; greg.moran@uniontrib.com

More@uniontrib.com

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:28 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (4)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:25 AM 

States Differ on Marijuana for PTSD

By DAN FROSCH

DENVER — A decade ago, Colorado became one of the earliest states to legalize medical marijuana. Its neighbor New Mexico did so more recently. But that does not mean the two states agree on all the medicinal merits of cannabis.

Related

Both states allow marijuana to be used to treat the symptoms of a variety of diseases, like AIDS and cancer. When it comes to treating post-traumatic stress disorder, however, New Mexico says yes to medical marijuana, while Colorado’s answer is a resounding no.

Those differences were highlighted this week in the Colorado legislature, when a State House committee on Monday narrowly defeated a proposal that would have directed the Department of Public Health and Environment to consider whether marijuana should be used to help people with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Dr. Ned Calonge, the chief medical officer for the health department, which was against the proposal, said psychiatry departments at the Veterans Affairs hospital in Denver and the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Denver agreed that marijuana should not be recommended for treating the disorder.

“There is no evidence of efficacy of marijuana for treatment of P.T.S.D. in the medical literature,” Dr. Calonge said Tuesday in an interview. “In fact, the published literature suggests that such use leads to addiction and abuse of other substances.”

At the same time, he said, some clinical evidence supports the drug’s effectiveness in treating those conditions for which medical marijuana is already approved in Colorado. “I think we’ve set the bar pretty low,” he added.

But supporters of the Colorado proposal cited New Mexico as an example to follow. In that state, the Health Department came to a drastically different conclusion. In January 2009, a medical advisory committee recommended that post-traumatic stress disorder was an eligible condition for medical marijuana treatment.

In its report, the committee acknowledged that there were no specific clinical trial data regarding the use of marijuana in treating the disorder. But the committee noted that when smoked, marijuana could help relieve anxiety associated with post-traumatic stress disorder, and cited a number of psychiatric and pharmacological studies.

The secretary of the New Mexico Department of Health, Dr. Alfredo Vigil, signed off on the recommendation a month later.

“There are hints and some indications in the medical literature that there are components of cannabis that might be helpful to some people with P.T.S.D.,” Dr. Vigil said Tuesday in an interview, adding, “All of these states are going out on a limb, trying to determine from a medical, clinical point of view, what seems reasonable.”

Currently, more than a quarter of the 1,376 patients approved for medical marijuana in New Mexico have post-traumatic stress, more than any other condition including cancer, according to the Health Department. It is unclear how many are veterans.

To qualify, a patient needs a referral from a primary care doctor or a psychiatrist along with documents from the psychiatrist certifying that the patient has the disorder.

The debate over post-traumatic stress came as Colorado’s legislature grapples with how to regulate the dispensation of medical marijuana throughout the state. Since the federal Justice Department announced in the fall that it would not prosecute people who use marijuana for medical purposes in states where it is legal, shops have sprung up all over Denver selling medical marijuana, ostensibly only to those who have a doctor’s prescription.

“If there is any legitimate use for any medicine to treat P.T.S.D., we have an obligation to consider it,” said State Representative Sal Pace, a Democrat from Pueblo, who introduced Colorado’s proposal.

Steve Fox, director of state campaigns for the Marijuana Policy Project, which favors the legal regulation of the drug, said he was disappointed in the Colorado vote, particularly given New Mexico’s policy. He noted that many antidepressants prescribed to veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder have a range of potentially serious side affects, whereas medical marijuana is comparatively benign.

Mr. Pace said he hoped that the Health Department or the legislature would reconsider using marijuana to treat post-traumatic stress symptoms.

“I’m not a doctor. I’m not a psychiatrist. I can’t judge myself whether this is legitimate medicine,” Mr. Pace said. “But if we can’t even open the door to that discussion, then we are potentially prohibiting medicine to a needy class of citizens.”

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:25 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:24 AM 

NORML’s Deputy Director Debates The Drug Czar

Well, the ex-Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey that is. (As a rule, acting Drug Czar’s do not debate marijuana law reformers in public forums.)

Below is the clip from this afternoon’s edition of the Dylan Ratigan Show on MSNBC.

Before anyone comments, yes I am well aware that the host — who was clearly favorable to NORML’s position — did not give us equal time. Then again, former General McCaffrey is a regular consultant to MSNBC (and a guest) so the deference was to be expected. That said, Ratigan, to his credit, did allow me the first and the last word on the subject.

Anyone who wants to read all of what I would have liked to have said, given the proper time, can see my recent commentary — Are U.S. Pot Laws the Root Cause of Mexican Drug Violence? — from last week’s online edition of The Hill, or you can listen to my recent appearance on FoxNews.com. I think they say it all.

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:24 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:17 AM 

Senior Citizens Are Starting Medical Marijuana Businesses to Replace Lost Retirement Funds.

Granny is now growing and selling Ganja to keep from going under. Retirees and Baby Boomers are increasingly turning to the medical marijuana industry and starting businesses, Hempgard University is teaching them.

San Francisco, CA (PRWEB) March 24, 2010 — Many Baby Boomers are starting medical marijuana businesses as a way to overcome the extremely bleak employment outlook, and restore their lost retirement nest eggs.

Seniors have been hit particularly hard by the downturn in the economy. Their retirement funds have been decimated and social security is no longer keeping up with the cost of living. With few options available to them, more and more senior citizens are starting medical marijuana business as a viable way to make ends meet.

Senior citizens and baby boomers are increasingly starting medical marijuana businesses to restore retirement nest eggs.

“In the last few years there has been an upward swing in people coming into the business, in both age and affluence,” said Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the DC-based National Organization for Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML). “They are either retirees or boomers seeing a chance for mid-life career change and grabbing it”

The internet is helping to make it easy for Baby Boomers and Retirees to learn how to start a Medical Marijuana business. Hempgard University is offering an affordable online e-course which teaches how to start and operate the following types of medical marijuana businesses:

-Medical Marijuana Dispensary
-Medical Marijuana Delivery Service
-Medical Marijuana Edibles Business
-Medical Marijuana Commercial Grow

The medical marijuana industry can be an especially good fit for Boomers and Seniors; just as a function of age, older people are more likely to know people afflicted with the conditions for which doctors can recommend marijuana. These conditions include arthritis, cancer, glaucoma, chronic pain, persistent muscle spasms, etc.. This gives many older people a really good potential patient (client) base, to build their medical marijuana businesses from.

“We have made medical marijuana business training easier to obtain,” said Liz Cortese, Student Services, Hempgard University. “Through the comprehensive e-course, boomers and senior citizens can easily and affordably learn the medical marijuana business from the comfort of their home, with out having to travel to a class or seminar. The e-course saves them time and money, so they can get their businesses up and running.”

Who would have thought Grandma and Grandpa would be using their green thumbs to grow a Ganja garden?

About Hempgard University

Hempgard University provides the most advanced business training for the medical cannabis industry, to students nationwide, through the online e-course and live seminars. Hempgard University has an active alumni network, and provides students support. Since being founded, hundreds of students have taken their advanced, in-depth course and gone on to successfully enter the emerging medical cannabis industry.

Contact:

JB Wilson
415.933.3570
or go to http://www.HempgardUniversity.com

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:17 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog
 27 Mar 2010 @ 8:15 AM 

Mexico Has A Problem With Pot Use — OUR Pot Use

By Dennis Romero, Friday, Mar. 26 2010 @ 8:01AM
125px-Flag_of_Mexico.svg.png

Oh will the ironies ever cease? Mexico has turned up its nose at the United States’ sudden infatuation with medical marijuana — what with New Jersey and possibly even New York approving the drug for medicinal purposes.

The administration of Mexican President Felipe Calderon apparently feels that its freer use in places like California — which will vote on full legalization of pot in November — doesn’t help his nation’s increasingly bloody drug war. We pull as the drug lords there push, leaving victims in their wake, he seems to be saying. Well EXCUUUSE us! We have a little news for Senor Calderon:

Mexico invented marijuana! (Well, not really, but almost). If it weren’t for pot, American teens everywhere would not know how to pronounce the Spanish “j” as an “h.”

If it were originally sourced in the United States it would be called, like, Steve-a-juana or Smith’s Fine Smoking Weed, and one or two East Coast families would have controlled its cultivation since prohibition. We’d have added it to everything like we do with corn syrup. Congress would heavily subsidize it. And instead of an obesity epidemic we’ve have a stupidity epidemic (which, some of you might argue, we do anyway). The nerve of Mexico.

“It is inevitable that if this [full legalization] occurs in California, a neighboring state that is so important to us, that there will be repercussions here,” says Mexican pundit Lorenzo Meyer Cossio, according to the Miami Herald.

However, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, following a visit to Mexico earlier this week, stated that there’s no evidence indicating that the legalization of medical marijuana in several U.S. states has increased demand for Mexican pot.

” .. We do not see this as a major contributor to the continuing flow of marijuana, the vast, vast majority of which is used for recreational purposes,” Clinton is quoted by the Herald as saying.

Stephen Gutwillig, California director of the pro-pot Drug Policy Alliance, told the paper that as marijuana becomes more legal in the U.S., it will actually put drug lords out of business: “Any sort of authorized regulated market for marijuana in the United States cannot be good for the bottom line of criminal cartels,” he said.

Smoke on that, Mexico.

More@ http://blogs.laweekly.com/ladaily/community/mexico-pot-problem/

Posted By: admin
Last Edit: 27 Mar 2010 @ 08:15 AM

EmailPermalinkComments (0)
Tags
Categories: Mids Magazine Blog

 Last 50 Posts
Change Theme...
  • Users » 66
  • Posts/Pages » 268
  • Comments » 28,775
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight

About



    No Child Pages.